List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Identify faults in products/production | 1.1 | Examine products/production process |
| 1.2 | Identify faults |
| 1.3 | Categorise faults according to type/likely cause |
| 1.4 | Prioritise faults for action |
|
2 | Determine most probable possible cause(s) of fault | 2.1 | Analyse fault to determine possible causes |
| 2.2 | Investigate possible causes to eliminate less probable causes |
| 2.3 | Short list probable causes |
| 2.4 | Check hypothesis of cause(s) is supported by the data available |
| 2.5 | Identify most probable cause |
|
3 | Implement solution to fault | 3.1 | Develop recommended solution to fault |
| 3.2 | Check health, safety and environment (HSE) implications of solution and modify solution as appropriate |
| 3.3 | Communicate the recommendation as appropriate |
| 3.4 | Check recommendation has been understood and can be implemented |
| 3.5 | Check all hazard controls are in place |
| 3.6 | Monitor progress of implementation |
| 3.7 | Modify recommended solution as required |
|
4 | Check fault solution has worked | 4.1 | Monitor product/process for fault |
| 4.2 | Monitor HSE impacts of changes |
| 4.3 | Repeat analysis and solution process if required |
| 4.4 | Update records and procedures to reflect successful solution |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and demonstrate the ability to:
read and interpret test results, technical information, product specifications, instruments/control panels, material labels and safety data sheets (SDS)
examine products/process to identify faults via one (1) or more of:
visual examination
examination of product quality or other records
examination of inspection records
examination of test results
specific examination testing undertaken as part of a product improvement activity
analyse the faults to identify all feasible causes of the problem
investigate possible causes to short list probable causes including one (1) or more of:
talking with operators and others
checking machine histories for prevailing process conditions
checking current process/equipment conditions
carrying out small tests to determine the likelihood of a causal link between a condition and a fault
confirm most probable cause based on available data
develop and communicate solution to the fault which meets safety requirements
monitor implementation of the solution and review and make adjustments as required
communicate effectively with team/work group and supervisors
complete workplace records
document updates to procedures
write equipment/process condition specifications.
Must provide evidence that demonstrates knowledge relevant to their job sufficient to fulfil their job role including knowledge of:
how the process/equipment works
characteristics of materials and their behaviour in relation to process conditions and stages of production
impact of variations process conditions on the product
impacts of equipment failure/change/variation on the product
changes to materials at various stages of production
quality/inspection/testing regime and relationship of results of to process conditions and equipment faults
types of product faults, including variations in:
colour
surface finish
size/shape
physical properties
chemical properties
biological/biochemical/microbiological properties
types of process/equipment condition problems, including:
settings, such as temperature and pressure
rates, such as feed rate and flow rate
setting and adjustment of equipment parts
worn and broken equipment parts
product faults that can be caused by process/equipment problems and possible solutions
organisation procedures relevant to the work environment/job role
hierarchy of control
hazards that may arise in the job/work environment and:
their possible causes
potential consequences
appropriate risk controls.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The diagnosis and solving of a number of faults with different types of causes is required, including:
product defect with process condition cause
product defect with equipment problem cause
process fault/problem with process condition or equipment cause.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should use a real project in an operational workplace. Where this is not possible or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors assessment must occur using a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment that reflects realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from demonstration of skills and one or more of:
walk-throughs
pilot plant operation
industry-based case studies/scenarios
‘what ifs’.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews.
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment shall demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they shall assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on the job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.